June 2007 Newsletter - in the know

 

In This Issue:

 

Wednesday, June 13, 2007
 


HRANS 2007

 

The HRANS 2007 Conference is over.  It was an excellent event with superb keynote speakers and workshop presentations.  HRA was proud to be a part of it on many levels, sponsoring a breakfast, presenting a panel discussion, and show-casing an HR software solution at the trade show.  This newsletter is a follow-up where you will learn:


  • Who won the iPod Shuffle draws?
  • The latest developments in the Future of Labour Relations
  • A template for selecting HR software
  • ACHRA nominations reminder


[ Top ]

And the winners are...

 

HRA sponsored two iPod Shuffle draws for people signing up for our complimentary e-newsletter at the HRANS 2007 Tradeshow, and at the HRA-sponsored breakfast.  The draws were held on Thursday, May 24 at the breakfast.  And the winners are:

  • Lorraine Brown
    Director, Human Resources
    Atlantic Health Sciences Corporation 

  • David Osborne
    Vice President
    Predictive Success Corporation

    Congratulations to our winners, and our thanks to all who participated in the draw.

 


[ Top ]

The Future of Labour Relations Just Became More Complicated

 

At the HRANS 2007 Conference, three of HRA's labour relations consultants presented a panel discussion on Strategic Partnerships: The Future of Labour Relations.   Phil Veinotte, Michele Dorsey and Ronald MacLeod shared their experiences and projections of changes needed in labour relations so that organizations can survive and succeed in an era of tight labour supply.  A copy of their slide show is attached.

Two weeks after their presentation, the Supreme Court of Canada released a decision that adds a new dimension to labour relations issues in Canada: the collective bargaining process is protected by the Canadian Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms

Reversing its own jurisprudence, the Supreme Court of Canada ruled that 2(d) of the Charter of Rights, freedom of association, applies to the right  to bargain collectively.  On that basis, the Court declared parts of B.C.'s Health and Social Services Delivery Improvement Act to be unconstitutional. 

If you recall, this was legislation passed by B.C. in 2002 to override collective agreement protections for hospital workers in the areas of contracting out, and layoff and bumping rights.  As a result  of the legislation, thousands of staff were laid off from B.C. hospitals, and paid substantially less by service providers to perform the same services at the hospitals from which they had been laid off.   In finding part of the legislation unconstitutional, the Supreme Court of Canada commented on the following pitfalls:

  • there was no consideration by the government of less intrusive measures

  • the legislation was adopted rapidly with full knowledge that the unions were strongly opposed to many of the provisions without explanation of the government's choices

The Court's ruling appears to be crafted in such a way as to avoid Charter challenges in the ordinary course of bargaining.  For example, the Court noted that the constitutional right to collective bargaining concerns the protection of the ability of workers to engage in associational activities, and their capacity to act in common to reach shared goals related to workplace issues and terms of employment.  It specifically noted that Section 2(d) of the Charter does not guarantee particular objectives sought through this associational activity but rather the process through which those goals are pursued.

This suggests that, in respect of public employers to whom the Charter applies, the Courts will act to protect employees' right to unite, to present demands to their employers collectively and to engage in negotiations in an attempt to achieve workplace-related goals  This ruling elevates public employers duty to bargain in good faith to Charter status.  It also puts constraints on the exercise of legislative powers in respect of the right to collective bargaining. However, s. 2(d) does not protect all aspects of the associational activity of collective bargaining. It protects only against "substantial interference" with associational activity.

While it will take some time to digest the full impact of this decision, it is clear that the courts will be more active referees in public sector bargaining, which will in turn set the standard for private sector bargaining conduct.


[ Top ]

Atlantic Canada HR Awards Nominations

 

High performing organizations know the value of rewards and recognition, and few things rival the value of recognition from one's peers.  It is time for HR professionals to walk the talk and make nominations for the 2007 Atlantic Canada Human Resources Awards (ACHRA) in four award categories:

  • Innovation in Human Resources
  • Strategic Partnerships
  • New Human Resources Leaders
  • Excellence in Human Resources


The Awards Criteria and full instructions for submitting a nomination are available on the ACHRA website.The deadline for nominations is September 7, 2007.  This year, the Awards gala will be hosted by HRANS-PEI at the Delta Prince Edward, Charlottetown, PEI on October 4.  Details on the gala, and related professional development activities will be posted on the HRANS website in the coming weeks.


[ Top ]

Mental Health Works Wins Again!

 

Mental Health Works, a division of the Canadian Mental Health Association of Ontario, has been recognized by the Canadian Council on Learning (CCL) for its Complex Issues, Clear Solutions workshop.  Celebrated at  Sharing the Flame: Recognizing Excellence in Learning, a national conference held in Ottawa, June 12-13, 2007, Mental Health Works will be in good company with other award winners from the University of Ottawa Centre for e-Learning, and the Canadian Living Foundation's Breakfast for Learning program.

The New Brunswick, Nova Scotia, and Prince Edward Island divisions of the Canadian Mental Health Association have recognized the value of the Complex Issues, Clear Solutions workshop.  HRA is proud to partner with these divisions offering this workshop in the Maritime provinces.  Kathryn Coll, of HRA,  attended the gala award dinner in Toronto as a representative trainer for Eastern Canada.  For more information on Complex Issues, Clear Solutions, and other mental health in the workplace workshops, click here. 


[ Top ]

How to Shop for HRIS

 

Looking for a system that increases your organization’s data accuracy, helps you ensure regulatory compliance and allows ad-hoc reporting and analysis?

HRA's Michael Cunningham has some advice for those ready to invest in an in-house Human Resources Information System (HRIS) or Human Resources Management System (HRMS).

While these systems do not replace human resource professionals, it frees them from mundane paper transactions, and enables them to optimize your organization’s internal resources.

But how do you choose from the many HRIS products on the market? 


Michael has summarized key considerations to create  a checklist for small to mid-size organizations to help you assess which option is right for you:

  • What problems do you want to solve?

    • This is a more important question than what you want the software to do. Gadgets and programs can "do" lots of things, but if they aren’t solving a challenge for your organization, what’s the point?

  • Do you need to track employees? calculate payroll?

    • Do you need support for streamlining recruitment and retention functions?
    • Do you need to track data to gain efficiencies?

  • What is your budget?

    • Software is just part of the necessary investment. Keep in mind that software is just a 25%-50% of the costs. Hardware, networking, implementation and training can be two to four times the cost of the software.

  • Who should be involved on the selection team?

    • HR

    • IT 
      • The HRIS selection to meet IT standards used by the organization, saving money and support time

    • Payroll & Accounting
      • Related users of the system are more likely to accept the HRIS if they are part of the selection process

    • Senior Management
      • Implementation and rollout will go much more smoothly if senior management endorses the project and gives it a high priority.


  • What to look for

    • Choose the smallest system that will fill your needs for the near future
      • There is little value in trying to buy for projected needs more than four or five years out.  While larger systems are more flexible and powerful, an oversized system is expensive in terms of dollars and maintenance, in addition to increased training costs. Furthermore, you will find that the largest software vendors are often unwilling or unequipped to deal with smaller organizations.

    • What is on your wish list?
      • Desired High-Level Functions (What functions do you want to automate?)
        • Core HRIS applications:
          • Payroll – Functions that assist in payroll administration and processing, as well as tax processing
          • Personnel Administration – Functions that track employee data and process personnel and organizational changes.
          • Benefits – Functions that track benefits plans and programs including health, dental, insurance and retirement, as well as enrollment, balances, etc. 

        • Additional functionality:
          • Advanced Personnel Administration
          • Compliance (Regulatory)
          • Disciplinary actions
          • Performance appraisals
          • Training information/management and skills inventory
          • Recruiting
          • Compensation planning and management
          • Time and attendance
          • Self-Service

        • Specialty functionality:
          • Stock option management
          • Pension administration
          • Health and safety management
          • Succession planning

    • Specify functional requirements
      • Describe in detail how the system should functionally operate to support the process.  It is not enough to say, "I want to process payroll." Determine if you need the system to prioritize deductions, allow payroll runs for employees with varying work-week calendars, allow unlimited "pre-payroll" processing to see the outcome of a payroll before it impacts employee records and prints
        cheques or pay stubs.

    • Specify technical requirements
      • The larger the system, the more complex your choices. For example, very small systems may only require technical specifications such as database type and network compatibility, whereas very large systems will require you to consider how the application connects to the Internet, workflow capabilities, Lightweight Directory Access Protocol (LDAP), etc.

    • Technical support needs
      • If your organization does not have internal IT support, you will want to know what kind of technical support packages are available.
      • You may also require multiple language capabilities.

    • Create Your Selection Criteria & Weighting
      • Determine how you will compare competing bids.
      • Use your selection committee to identify priorities and set scoring

    • Contact Vendors That Have Products In Your Range
      • There are three general tiers of product:
        • Off the shelf systems that are relatively inexpensive, but do not permit tailoring.  Your organization must make its processes fit what the software can do.  These are good solutions for small employers with very basic needs.

        • Off the shelf systems that offer some customization.  These have a higher price tag, but may be a better fit for small- to medium-sized organizations that need systems that fit their needs.  Sage HRMS (ABRA / ACCPAC HRMS) are in this middle tier of products; they are off the shelf, but allow for customization.

        • Fully customized systems that are built to the organization's needs and specifications.  These solutions are powerful applications, but usually are only affordable for large organizations.

    • Develop a Request for Proposal (RFP)
      • It must be detailed enough to yield complete information which can be compared from one vendor to another, but it should not be so onerous as to discourage the small vendors from responding.
      • Include
        • Information necessary for the vendor to understand your organization and its needs
        • Number of employees, number of users
        • Objectives
        • Technology infrastructure
        • Set out mandatory requirements in the form of a questionnaire as a helpful tool for both the vendor and the selection committee
      • Request pricing, according to specified terms (e.g., by module or number of named users)
      • The software selection process
        • Due dates
        • Contact names

    • Selection Process
      • Based on the selection committee's initial screening, select the top two or three vendors for demonstrations.
      • Ensure the key players on the selection committee are present for the demo
      • Clearly outline to the vendors beforehand which functions you expect to see and in what order (a demo "script")
      • Provide a "score card" for the selection committee to indicate their likes and dislikes during each demo

    • Make a deal
      • Identify a Preferred Vendor
      • Perform Due Diligence Checks
        • Confirm vendor information
        • Perform reference checks
      • Finalize Contract


And now you are ready to get started to put the acquisition to work.  But that's another story for another day...

 


[ Top ]